On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if any one slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if any one saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land. (Quran 5:32)

Therefore, it is completely superfluous to enter into wars of numbers to define which side is more sinful. It is time we all need to take responsibility. Even the blood of one single victim sticks to us. We are not innocent, we have to do a lot to change because really, things are not going right. But sometimes people are exaggerating and blame us with things that is not true. They are stigmatizing us, forming from us an enemy image in order to build a policy on it.

I know that I often bite into my own Muslims, vehemently criticizing the "brainwashed" emblematic leaders who give causes for attacks against us. This will continue to be the case. I do this not because I like to be a bit provocative, but in order to avoid the accusations of not recognizing the negative tendencies between us and not acting. But yes, we notice and act. But we also take action against disproportionate blames from outside. However, such accusations can be experienced both at troll attack and political declaration level.

We are not sinless as I wrote, but there should not be built a hate policy on this. Just as we expect the "brainwashed" leaders on our side to fix themselves. If they murder people, this should be explained by their Satanic doctrines and not by Islam. They have to stop the horrors! At the same time, the Hungarian Prime Minister should not create divisions or hatred using the terminology of protection Christian values against Islam. What are the values that are considered to be Christians only and are not among the universal values of the whole civilization? Anyone who sees the daily political issues a little bit beyond the level of pubs and opinion dictators, is well aware that Islam is just a sentimental stuffing to the migrant issue which is artificially overcharged with disproportionate presentation of the crimes committed on our side. The real goal is to dismantle the EU, for which Trump and Putin are using our government as a device. Of course, this also requires the impotence of the EU, too. We Muslims and Islam are just a small point on the palette of the arsenal of communication assets that they use. Therefore, every violent reaction we give or terrorist act, whether it is committed directly by our "brainwashed ones" or indirectly by being instigated by the beneficiaries of the interests, serves a much greater purpose. This is further complemented by statements by all sorts of security experts and foreign policy advisers, who by referring to "credible" sources (Bill Warner, Robert B. Spencer, etc.), confirm the legitimacy of fear from us. Our government is thus protecting the walls in glory, while the EU is a last-ditch, unpredictable gang (except when money is distributed).

At the same time, I consider our prime minister a political genius. I see no better than him in the second or third lines after him. My only concern is his profession and not his skills. Politician and politics are like that. No matter if a safe-breaker is a genius, when his genius can only be exploited in safe-breaker profession. I do not know him as a human being, so I would be far removed from his judgment in this regard. However, Putin is greater genius and behind Trump (whom I also don't classify) there is an enormous organization which we cannot compete with. Our leaders are jammed up between these two, and we Muslims are sucking up the harmful consequences of that. We're just a little argument, between many others, but we are there. We are good enough to generate with us some excitements and sentiments. We have to shrug ourselves off these trends and continue to deliver our right hand for peace, because the great masses of people are fed-up with the hatred and tension. In the long run, history will judge those who shape the present. But we're not stupid so we understand and see.

I don't want to enter to etymological reasoning, but whoever invented the Islamic terrorism phrase, was out of his mind. It is a self-denying word structure. The word Islam, which is derived from the word Salam in this impossible combination, expresses the terror of reconciliation. Can it exist? Combining Islam with a negative adjective means peace with a negative adjective.

Let's talk rather about radicals or criminals when we speak about terror. If we agreed, keeping the 1-2 million Uyghur Muslims in China violently in transformation camps, as well as the persecution and exile of 712,000 Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, is terror without adjective. Myanmar President Aun San Suu Kyi was hosted by Viktor Orban in Budapest. But if we insist to use the adjectives, let's put the word Christian before the Lord's Resistance Army, who are committing crimes against humanity in Uganda, the Congo, the Central African Republic and South Sudan, and the International Criminal Court (ICC) Hague, have issued an arrest warrant against their leaders. But we could mention Charles Taylor in Liberia, or those responsible for the Hutu-Tutsi conflict in Rwanda, and we never get to the end.

I’d like to express my thanks for the community of my readers the movement in which Muslims and non-Muslims have stood up against a troll attack defending my side these days. Here I have found a unit that reinforces my devotion to continue this page. I saw calm, thoughtful, and respectful responses given to provocative comments that stigmatized us, which were difficult to react without emotions. But we succeeded and I consider this a victory. The subject was as usual. We are terrorists, jihadist killers and so on. This is where the story started and escalated with the negative involvement of Allah. This was obviously a test. It will be more like that. In response, I received a lot of arguments (many thanks and blessing from Allah), and let me publish here some diagrams that worth to know:

1. Twentieth Century Deaths in War and Political Violence by Religions committed by Christians of European Heritage and Muslims 

https://hu.pinterest.com/pin/367043438360757248/?autologin=true

2. Islamists were responsible for only 0.7% of terror attacks in Europe between 2006 and 2013, according to Europol statistics

https://www.counterfire.org/news/17599-graphic-islamist-terror-accounts-for-only-0-7-ofattacks-in-europe

3. People killed by terrorism per year in Western Europe 1970-2015

https://www.datagraver.com/case/people-killed-by-terrorism-per-year-in-western-europe1970-2015

These are only data quoted for the indicated period regarding Europe. If you need worldwide data, you might check out the Wikipedia pages about the annual data concerning terrorist acts. These will show the extent of terrorist acts committed by extremist organizations against Muslim population. But I'm not starting a competition! The way I began, I close my bottom-line: a single victim is considered too much and it doesn't matter who it is. Let there be peace between us. Ameen.